Team Leaders for the Tree Inventory at King – Summer 2015

EMinventory“I learned to identify trees, I participated in an activity in my neighborhood that gave me increased connections both to the physical environment and people in my neighborhood, I enjoyed every minute, and I learned about resources in Portland that are related to parks, trees, and environmental improvement.”

Walking around your neighborhood, do you see spaces to plant a tree, street trees in need of maintenance, and neighbors who are concerned about their trees but don’t know where to begin? Through the Tree Inventory Project, Urban Forestry is helping Portlanders take action to improve their community’s street trees, one neighborhood at a time.

The Tree Inventory Project began with a pilot neighborhood street tree inventory in 2010. Since then, the project has grown in leaps and bounds, and 17 neighborhoods have partnered with Urban Forestry so far to inventory street trees and create action-oriented neighborhood tree management plans. To date, volunteers have identified, measured, and mapped 70,000 street trees!

Active neighborhood groups interested in trees begin by gathering volunteers to help conduct a street tree inventory. Volunteers are guided by Urban Forestry staff, who provide training, tools, and event organization. Together, information is collected on tree species, size, health, site conditions, and available planting spaces. Data are analyzed by Urban Forestry staff, and findings are presented to neighborhood stakeholders at an annual Tree Summit  at the end of the season in November. At the summit, neighborhood groups begin developing tree plans: They form a working neighborhood tree group and set achievable strategies to improve existing trees, expand tree canopy, and connect the neighborhood with city and nonprofit resources. The resulting Neighborhood Tree Plan is based on the current status and health of neighborhood street trees and provides recommendations for specific neighborhood actions to improve canopy. In the past, neighborhood groups have organized pruning workshops, secured funding to widen small planting strips, and planted street trees.

More than just producing data and a tree plan, this project brings communities together. Participating in the tree inventory project is a great way to meet your neighbors and connect with others who value our green resources!

Please contact diego@kingneighborhood.org if you are interested in participate.

Continue reading

KNA letter to Majestic Realty (developer at empty Vanport lot), issued 11/10.

KNA-logo

November 10, 2014

 

Phillip Brown

Majestic Realty

13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Sixth Floor

City of Industry, CA 91746

 

Dear Mr. Brown,

I write today on behalf of the King Neighborhood Association regarding your proposed design for the development of the lot at the Northwest corner of NE Alberta Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Development on this lot presents an exciting opportunity to enhance the livability of our neighborhood. While we are pleased that you so quickly secured another potential grocer to serve as your anchor tenant, we have concerns regarding the design plans proposed at the Portland Development Commission’s Martin Luther King Jr Alberta Project Working Group.

The proposed design plan does not activate the corner of NE Alberta Street and Martin Luther King Jr Blvd. The main entry should be on NE Alberta Street. The entrance in your design is currently placed to face the parking lot, while the walls of the back end of the store present to the street corner. This orientation values car traffic in a manner that is inconsistent with the character of NE Alberta Street and fails to activate this bustling corner. If your anchor tenant’s business model is not adaptable to this setting, perhaps you could carve out space along Alberta for smaller tenants who are able to make better use of orientation to the street.

 

Proper activation of NE Alberta also involves windows. There should be windows along NE Alberta Street looking into active interior spaces of the business (es). Windows along Martin Luther King Jr Blvd should be clear and should look into the store(s); signs, advertisements, etc should not obscure them. This welcoming feature continues the existing character of NE Alberta Street, fosters safety on the sidewalk, and intimately advertises the business. Walls that have no windows or doors should appear consistent with the feel of a neighborhood where commercial development meets residential use. As one neighbor said of a blank wall, “make it interesting.”

 

We are eager to see a healthy exchange of foot traffic between all three buildings on the two lots. The design of the existing Vanport structures anticipates pedestrian traffic, and the final phase of the project should support that goal.

 

Development on the lot will subject the four existing homes on the Northwest corner to significant pollutions, including the following: light from the parking lot, headlights, and buildings; noise from customers, deliveries, trash pick up, etc.; trash from littering and inadvertent trash container leakage; rodents attracted by trash, recycling, and accidental spills. We ask that you protect these homes from the effects of this pollution, using landscaping, sensitive scheduling of noisy truck interactions (trash, deliveries), as well as thoughtful placement of these activities. For example, we ask that you not place trash bins along the property line with these houses.

Continue reading

Agenda for this Wednesday’s KNA meeting.

KNA logo

King Neighborhood Association General Meeting

at the King Neighborhood Facility, 4815 NE 7th Avenue

http://kingneighborhood.org

 

Wednesday, November 12, 2014 – 6:30 to 8:30 pm

 

 

Draft Agenda
6:30    Welcome and introductions.

 

6:35     Approval of minutes and agenda (Margo).

 

6:40   United Neighborhoods for Reform (UNR) resolution (Margaret Davis).

 

7:10   Tree Inventory Project (Elizabeth Specht).

 

7:15   St. Andrews Nativity School’s Nativity Nosh –a Community Kitchen (Julia Ford)

 

7:25   Proposed Portland street fees.

 

7:45     KNA Land Use Committee update, including update from the Vanport/Alberta & MLK working group meetings (Leigh and Margo).

 

8:00   Green King update (Diego).

 

8:10   Safety in King update (Eileen).

 

8:15   Requests to use space in King school for public meetings by other organizations, including ADU tour and CURB PDX/Restore 3962 (Margo, Alan).

 

8:20   King NA communications plan (tentative) (Margo).

 

8:25   Floor open to announcements from all in attendance.

 

8:30   Adjourn.

Update on CURB PDX’s campaign to help restore 3962 NE MLK.

10704014_1494201330852057_1145133740884598558_n

Burger Barn restoration committee leader Teressa Raiford sent out this release recently:

 

CURB PDX Gray Building Rehabilitation
3962 NE Martin Luther King Blvd.
Portland, Oregon USA
October 29th 2014

In early, 2011 I met Cathy Galbraith, Director of the Bosco-Milligan Foundation; I was attending their Black History Month event at the Foundation’s Architectural Heritage Center. At this initial meeting I was asked to make a request to my family, that the property at 3962 NE Martin Luther King be given a chance to be preserved, given its importance in Portland’s historic African American community. Galbraith was concerned that multiple demolitions over the past decades had left little memory of the African American character and history of North and Northeast Portland. Cathy’s charge had me question the inclusion of Black homeowners and business owners’ direct involvement in the trend of urban renewal that had long taken place in North and Northeast Portland. Clearly, there was little or no involvement with people of color regarding residential and community business development. While filtering up has physically rejuvenated the community, it had not included many African American and other long term property holders. The displacement of renters was casebook gentrification, because of historic long term disinvestment and exclusion; urban renewal is known to negatively impact the Black middle class, as blighted communities revitalize and transform without these stakeholders’ participation.

I also researched local archives and links provided by the Urban Studies department at Portland State University via Felicia Williams. These collections included extensive correspondence, letters, published articles and oral histories from long-time residents in the area. Most of these stories included systems and legislative actions that had prohibited foundational growth for African Americans and other minorities in the region.

Opportunities for development being presented to people and businesses moving into the Portland region does not show any specific indication that a serious effort was also being made to Black Portlanders. Who would African American property owners turn to for information if they wished to develop their own properties? Why does it seem that a specific demographic has not been included in the planning or resource allocation that would make it a feasible opportunity for everyone? In the years since my conversation with Cathy Galbraith and others, I’ve researched and attended a number of equity conversations around gentrification, and there is a renewed spark of interest in community outreach and education.

Fast forward to 2014… and the previously occupied space at 3962 MLK has recently closed its doors after decades of being run by local African Americans, nationally known for its soul food including my Grandparents’ restaurant “The Burger Barn”. The property owner, Andre Raiford was ready to redevelop the land in order to build a retail center or another development that would not include the Burger Barn building. I approached Andre, along with local Historian and Educator Dr. Tanya March, Ph.D., within days before the scheduled demolition. Afterwards we called an emergency meeting together with Cathy Galbraith and Kimberly Moreland at the AHC. Prior to the meeting I drafted a business vision (Soul Food Lots PDX) and a proposal for support. I asked for letters and statements from AHC and Kim’s organization (Oregon Black Pioneers) stating their support for rehab and continued use of the historic Burger Barn building.

We have maintained hope that this written support could help us obtain the partnerships and funding necessary to develop a business and use for the preservation-focused Burger Barn building. Since this partnership, we have received letters of support from The Portland Historic Landmarks Commission, Bosco-Milligan Foundation/Architectural Heritage Center, Oregon Black Pioneers, and King Neighborhood Association; additional support is coming from Livermore Architects and Engineering, Swinerton Construction, and an application has been submitted to Restore Oregon for inclusion in its “Most Endangered” listing.

Please share your thoughts, resources and intentions as they pertain to changing the trend of economic inequality, gentrification and racial discrimination in policy and legislation. I believe that this project is a step forward and I hope that this letter reaches people with a deep consciousness and a will to make a difference.

Teressa Raiford
Burgerbarnpdx@gmail.com

KNA will discuss Street Fee at Wed’s meeting – SE Uplift letter to Council on the fees below…

15124236-mmmain
MEMORANDUM

Date:               4 November 2014

To:                  Mayor Hales
Commissioner Fritz
Commissioner Fish
Commissioner Novick
Commissioner Saltzman

From:              Southeast Uplift Board of Directors

Subject:           Portland Street Fees

When the Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) proposed a new “Street Fee” earlier this year, a sense of urgency framed declarations about its absolute need.  Portland’s roads were falling apart, and if we failed to fix them, addressing the problem would only cost us much more in the long run.

In May, the Portland Bureau of Transportation, citing examples from a number of smaller cities in Oregon, proposed shifting tax burdens to home owners and local business and away from fuel users.  The discussion has been disjointed with little in the way of analysis and even less public involvement.

Southeast Uplift’s board representing the twenty inner southeast neighborhoods would like to make the following points:

  1. A fee, requiring no vote of the people, requires more public involvement, not less.  The discussion has lacked transparency, involved a very limited number of participants, and is not well understood.
  2. We need more time and more discussion about the choices between street maintenance and safety.
  3. The design of the fee and its implementations have serious deficiencies

Public Involvement and Transparency

Portland’s neighborhood associations are the primary focus of public involvement in the city.  In this case, there has been very limited communication with the neighborhood associations or the coalitions, like Southeast Uplift.

Concerned citizens have had access to a disorganized web site, but this provided few comprehensible answers.

Over the summer, two committees were formed, one composed of low income and advocacy groups and one representing business interests, to provide feedback on the street fee proposal.  These committees were not representative of the broader citizenry who will be asked to fund this measure.  The standard public involvement framework:  Office of neighborhood Involvement, coalitions, and neighborhood associations were neither consulted nor briefed by city officials.

If the street fee does not face the vote of the people.  Public involvement should be more intense, not less, and it should be possible for the average Portland resident to understand the proposal.

Lacking a more inclusive public process, the new fee should be put forward for a public vote.
Continue reading